Founder-delivered: I take four implementation slots a month. Two remain for August.
AEO-REX Birmingham
For UK clinics & law firms

Your next patient asked ChatGPT for a recommendation. It named the practice down the road.

I'm Shanaz Begum. I make regulated UK practices the answer ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Google AI Overviews give — measured on the prompts your actual patients and clients type, fixed in four weeks, and reported with screenshots either way.

Check your practice free → 90 seconds · no card · no call booked
✓ Fixed price, published below ✓ No movement in 90 days, next 3 months free ✓ Every audit run by me, not a junior
Shanaz Begum, founder of AEO-REX, Birmingham
Shanaz Begum · Founder CO. 17018571
Speaker at Saïd Business School, University of Oxford · Islam Channel Today Show · TVOne London · Applied Science lecturer, BMet College
Credentials — every one of them checkable
The engines weigh verifiable authority. So should you.
Saïd Business School
Speaker · University of Oxford
Islam Channel
Today Show · January 2026
TVOne London
Featured interview
DesignRush
Top AI Company 2026
UK trademark
AEO-REX® · registered April 2026
Chambers member
Greater Birmingham · Redbridge

Three kinds of practice, one problem

High-value, locally chosen, and increasingly recommended by a machine rather than found on a map.

Dentist talking with a patient in a bright treatment room
Dental & implant practices

A single implant case is worth thousands. Patients now ask an AI which practice to trust before they ever open a website.

Two clinicians reviewing notes in a clinical corridor
Aesthetics & cosmetic surgery

Prospective patients research safety, qualifications and price for weeks. The engines answer those questions on your behalf, accurately or not.

Three professionals reviewing and signing documents in a meeting room
Solicitors & law firms

87% of firms tested had no AI citation share at all. The few that do are taking the enquiries quietly, in their own postcode.

Photography is illustrative and does not depict clients of AEO-REX.

Three things that are true about your website this morning

None of this is speculation. It is measurable on your domain in under a minute, and most practices fail all three without ever being told.

74/100

UK small businesses were found actively blocking GPTBot in their own robots.txt — most had no idea.

Study of 100 UK small businesses, January 2026. Only 3 had any AI discovery files. Average visibility score: 31/100. This is a five-minute fix that most agencies never check.

87%

of UK law firms tested had zero AI citation share for the queries their own clients ask.

Independent 2026 audit, 80 firms × 200 queries × 5 platforms. The 13% that do appear are quietly taking the entire AI-driven enquiry market in their area. Firms that started in 2024 are still extending the lead.

55%

of UK consumers now research a legal or health question with AI before they contact anyone.

Around 40% of UK adults have asked a chatbot a health question. Roughly one in three UK Google searches now returns an AI Overview above the blue links. The consideration set is decided before your website is ever opened.

What invisibility costs you

Move the two sliders. It's your own arithmetic, not mine.

Most owners don't notice this leak for a full quarter, because nothing breaks. The phone just rings slightly less than it should, and the enquiries go somewhere you can't see.

Average value of one new client or case£3,000
New enquiries you get in a typical month22
Enquiries forming inside an AI answer instead of Google
6 a month
Of those, the share going to a competitor because you aren't named
5 missed
Revenue that walked, on your own numbers
£4,500
per month · £54,000 a year

Assumptions, stated plainly: 25% of enquiries now begin in an AI-mediated answer (UK surveys put AI-first research at 25–40% of under-45s), 85% of practices are not named in those answers, and you convert 30% of enquiries you actually receive. Change any of them on the call and the number changes. This is an illustration, not a measurement — the free check gives you your real score.

Live teardowns of real UK practices

These are not clients and I make no claim to have improved them. They are audits I ran on live, publicly accessible UK websites, with identifying details removed. Every “before” line is a fact I recorded on the date shown and can reproduce in front of you. I publish these instead of testimonials because they are checkable — and because the first thing you'll want to know is whether the same things are true of you.

Private dental practice · 4 surgeries · West Midlands
Invisible for every implant prompt in its own city
Before — recorded 9 July 2026
Not named once across 12 prompts covering implants, Invisalign and emergency appointments — ChatGPT recommended a practice nine miles away, three times
robots.txt blocking GPTBot and ClaudeBot; the site had never been read by either
No Dentist or MedicalClinic schema; opening hours, fee guide and practitioner names existed only inside images and a PDF
Clinical articles bylined “the team”; not one named GDC-registered clinician on a crawlable page
Gemini stated a fee range 40% below the practice's actual price list
What the four-week fix does
Crawler access opened and verified — measurable within a fortnight
Dentist, MedicalClinic and FAQ schema, with fees, hours and treatments as real text
Named clinician pages carrying GDC number, qualifications and specialism (named authorship correlated with 4× more citations in the 2026 legal-sector study)
Six answer-shaped treatment pages built around the exact questions the prompts revealed
Fee data corrected at source so engines stop quoting an old number
Diagnosis only. No outcome is claimed — this practice is not a client. Realistic first movement on prompts like these: weeks 6–10.
Aesthetics clinic · single site · Greater London
Beaten by a competitor with a worse website and better structure
Before — recorded 2 July 2026
Cited in 1 of 10 prompts; the clinic named in 8 of 10 has fewer reviews, a slower site and a third of the Instagram following
Entire treatment menu rendered by JavaScript after load — invisible to every AI crawler tested
Practitioner qualifications listed on the booking system, not the website
Three different addresses across Google, Companies House and the site footer, so no engine could resolve the clinic as one entity
No pricing information anywhere in crawlable text
What the four-week fix does
Treatment menu served as HTML, not injected by script
Single consistent entity: one name, one address, one phone, matched across every register and directory
Practitioner credentials, insurer and governing body on the page
Price bands published — engines will not confidently recommend what they cannot cost
Aftercare and safety content written to be quoted verbatim
The lesson audiences find hardest: the practice AI recommends is rarely the best one. It's the legible one.
Want to know which of those lines are true of your site? The check tests the same things. Run mine free →

The whole engagement, in four steps

01 · FREE
The 60-second check

Your domain, scored across the major engines. Tells you if you're blocking the crawlers and where you stand. No card, no call.

02 · £595
The human audit

40 prompts your real patients or clients type, run across five engines by me. Screenshots of who's named instead of you, and a fix list in priority order.

03 · FROM £2,400
Four-week implementation

I do the work: schema, llms.txt, named-practitioner authority pages, answer content, entity and citation signals. You approve; you don't build.

04 · FROM £350/MO
Watchdog

The engines change weekly and competitors move. Monthly re-scan, monthly fixes, one page of plain English. Rolling, cancel anytime.

Published prices. Because you deserve to know before the call.

Specialist AEO agencies in the UK charge £2,000–£10,000 a month, plus a £1,500–£5,000 onboarding fee. I'm one person with my own scanner, so I carry none of their per-client software licensing — that's a cost structure, not a corner cut. Here is the whole list.

Audit
£595
one-off · credited in full against implementation
40 prompts, 5 engines, run by me
Screenshot evidence of every competitor named ahead of you
Crawler-access and schema diagnosis
Prioritised fix list you can hand to any developer
Agent-readiness section scored
Add the AI Compliance Review at £450, or take both for £895 — £150 less than buying them separately.
Start with the free check
Implementation
£2,400
four weeks · from · two slots left for August
Everything in the audit, done rather than described
Schema, llms.txt, crawler access, entity consistency
Named-practitioner authority pages
Six answer-shaped pages for your highest-intent questions
Directory, register and citation clean-up
Check eligibility
Watchdog
£350/mo
rolling · after implementation · cancel anytime
Monthly re-scan of your tracked prompts
Competitor movement flagged with screenshots
Fixes applied, not just reported
One page of plain English, monthly
Engine and protocol changes handled for you
Add after month one
By application
Sector Authority
£1,800/mo
from · 6-month minimum · three practices at a time
For one practice per city and specialism — I will not take your competitor while we work together
SRA / GDC / FCA-aware content, written to be cited and to pass compliance
Monthly third-party citation and editorial placement
Named-partner and practitioner entity building
Quarterly sector benchmark: you, against every rival in your postcode
Places filled2 of 3
Join the waiting list
Exclusivity means I turn work away. Applications reviewed personally, in order received.
The bit I'm putting in writing

If your tracked prompts haven't moved in 90 days, the next three months are free.

Not a refund you have to chase — I keep working until the needle moves, at my cost. I can offer that because I choose who I take on: if the check shows there's nothing here worth fixing, I'll tell you so and charge you nothing.

Movement means movement. Named in an answer where you previously weren't, on prompts we agree in writing before I start — not impressions, not a chart that goes up.
Your audit fee comes off the build. £595 credited in full if you go ahead. So the diagnosis is effectively free if you act on it.
Nothing is locked in. The build is a one-off. Watchdog is rolling and cancellable. Authority is six months because the work genuinely takes that long — I'd rather say so than pretend.
Shanaz Begum, founder of AEO-REX
Who you actually work with

I taught physics for a decade. I'm good at explaining the thing everyone's pretending to understand.

Ten years in STEM education, most recently as an Applied Science lecturer at BMet College in Birmingham. When AI search took off through 2024 and 2025 I watched the same pattern repeat: patients and clients stopped Googling and started asking, and the practices I knew were not in the answers. The specialist agencies were priced for corporates. The DIY guides were generic. So I built the thing that was missing.

Evidence-led, founder-delivered, no juniors, no outsourcing. That's a promise about quality, so let me answer the obvious worry: I cap myself at four builds a month and three Authority clients precisely so that never becomes a queue. You get a direct number and a reply the same working day.

Working in public

My own score on my own scanner: 41 in March → 62 in July → 85 by October. Re-scanned monthly and published whether it flatters me or not.

Honest about stage

AEO-REX is early. I'd rather show you dated teardowns you can verify than a wall of testimonials you can't.

Find out what AI says about you. It takes 60 seconds and I don't call you.

Your score across the major engines, whether you're blocking the crawlers, and the three things costing you the most — on screen before you've finished your coffee. If it comes back healthy I'll tell you to spend your money elsewhere.

✓ No card. No sales call unless you ask for one.
✓ Your data isn't sold or shared. ICO registered, ZC099609.
✓ Under 40? I'll show you exactly which fix to do first, free.
Step 1 of 2
Which website should I check?
Email only on step 2, and only if you want the full report.

What is Answer Engine Optimisation?

Answer Engine Optimisation (AEO) is the practice of getting your business named and recommended by AI platforms including ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Microsoft Copilot. Where traditional SEO competes for a position on a page of ten blue links, AEO positions your business as the direct answer the AI gives when a customer asks for a recommendation.

When someone asks “who's the best implant dentist near me?” or “which solicitor should I use for a probate dispute in Birmingham?”, AI doesn't return a list of ten. It gives one answer, sometimes three. AEO-REX makes sure you are in it.

Key takeaways
AEO-REX is a founder-led Answer Engine Optimisation consultancy for UK regulated practices — clinics, dental practices and law firms — founded in 2026 by Shanaz Begum in Birmingham.
AEO gets your practice named and recommended by ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews; where SEO competes for rankings, AEO makes you the answer.
Prices are published: audit £595, AI compliance review £450 or £895 for both, four-week implementation from £2,400, Watchdog from £350/month, Sector Authority from £1,800/month by application.
Results typically build over 8–12 weeks, with authority signals in regulated sectors landing months 4–7; if tracked prompts haven't moved in 90 days the next three months are free.
You can check your own AI visibility score free in about 60 seconds.
Last updated: 27 July 2026

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from the £30-a-month AI tracking tools?

Those tools are a smoke alarm; I'm the fire brigade. They will tell you every day that ChatGPT names your competitor. They will never fix the crawler block in your robots.txt, write your schema, build your named-practitioner authority pages or earn you a third-party citation. If you have someone in-house to act on a dashboard, buy the dashboard — genuinely. If you don't, it's a subscription to bad news.

I read that anything under £1,500 a month is just rebranded SEO. Is yours?

That's largely fair, which is why I don't sell a £350 programme. The programme is the four-week build, paid once. £350 a month is what it costs to keep it working afterwards. Agencies can't price that low because they pay per-client licence fees to three tracking platforms; I built my own scanner, so I don't.

How long until it works?

Technical fixes can register in days — a crawler unblock sometimes shows in a fortnight. Consistent naming across engines takes 8–12 weeks, and in regulated sectors the authority signals typically land months four to seven. Anyone promising faster in legal or healthcare is guessing.

Is my compliance team going to have a problem with this?

The opposite, usually. SRA publicity rules and health advertising rules both require accuracy, and AI systems currently state wrong hours, wrong services and wrong prices for a large share of UK small businesses. Correcting what the engines say about you is a compliance improvement, not a marketing risk. Everything I publish goes to you for approval first.

Should I wait for ChatGPT Ads instead?

No. Paid placement will arrive and it will be expensive; the organic citation profile you build now is what the engines weigh, and it compounds. Starting in 2026 costs less than starting in 2028.

Which platforms do you cover?

ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot — plus agent-readiness checks for the emerging commerce protocols, included in every audit at no extra cost.

You're new. Why should I risk it?

Because the risk sits with me, not you: the audit is credited against the build, and if the tracked prompts haven't moved in 90 days you get three months free. I'm early, I say so on my own homepage, and I publish my own score even when it's mediocre. Judge me on the dated teardowns above.